Better questions build better companiesUS founders · Pre-seed to Series A
Scorecard

Weighted criteria and 0–5 anchors

Evidence before endorsement

Compare the engagement.

Read rating anchors →

Rate each criterion from 0–5. Unknown evidence earns no points. Edit weights to match your brief; they must total 100.

These are editorial thresholds, not proven quality categories. Scores never override legal, conflict or confidentiality gates. Saved only on this device.

For each criterion, record a 0–5 rating. Weighted points = (rating ÷ 5) × criterion weight. A 0 means missing or materially adverse evidence; 1 weak unsupported assertion; 3 credible partial evidence; 5 independently checkable evidence specific to the buyer's decision. Score absence as unknown/0 until resolved, rather than inventing a result.

Criterion Weight A 5/5 looks like A 0–1/5 looks like Evidence request
Decision and stage fit 15 Actual analogous seed/Series A decision work Prestige without relevant context 2 redacted analogous briefs
Constructive challenge 20 Shows counter-hypotheses and when own view changed Pure reassurance or confident opinion Dissent work sample + reference
Evidence and disconfirmation method 15 Source register, contrary data and explicit test design Unsupported framework slides Annotated methodology
Independence and conflicts 15 Written interests, referrals, sponsor rights and safeguards Refuses disclosures Signed conflict form
Scope, deliverables and timeliness 10 Fixed milestones, outputs, exclusions and deadline Vague retainer Written statement of work
Confidentiality and AI/data policy 10 Access, retention, AI processing and deletion documented Blanket “trust us” Contract schedules and policy
Commercial terms and exit 5 Fully comparable cash/equity, cancellation rules Ambiguous total liability Signed fee sheet / redlines
References and outcome honesty 5 Permissioned reference describing disagreement Only unverified growth claims Reference and attribution method
Boundary recognition / referrals 5 Seeks qualified legal/securities/finance input Gives unqualified legal recommendations Exclusion/escation schedule
Total 100

ICF's ethics code provides a useful external standard for coaching sponsor, privacy and conflicts questions; the SEC's broker-dealer guidance identifies an important hard legal boundary in funding engagements. ICF Code of Ethics, effective 1 April 2025 Broker-Dealers — US SEC

Sources cited on this page

  1. ICF Code of Ethics, effective 1 April 2025 ↗coachingfederation.org
  2. Broker-Dealers — US SEC ↗www.sec.gov
Download page ↓